LASIK-Flap

Uncovering secrets of the laser eye surgery industry

The LASIK Report

A Call for the Discontinuation of a Harmful Procedure
It is currently Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:36 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: CRSQA Quality Standards Advisory Committee
PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2006 7:15 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 306
http://www.usaeyes.org/faq/subjects/QSAC.htm

There are three medical doctors on CRSQA's "Quality Standards Advisory Committee".

Here is their contact information:

Richard Meister, MD
Fair Oaks, California
rmeister@starstream.net

Barrie Soloway, MD
New York, New York
bSolowaymd@pol.net

Daniel Durrie, MD, FACS
Kansas City, Missouri
ddurrie@durrievision.com

If anyone wants to complain about the standards of this bogus organization, I would suggest emailing these three. That's what I'm going to do.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 19, 2006 12:59 pm 
Offline
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 7:56 am
Posts: 10
--------I hear that Soloway is an excellent doctor, but he is clearly not immune from the greed that infects the refractive surgery industry in general. Why else would he join a bogus organization like CRSQA? His involvement with Presby, and the resultant conflicts of interest between his duty to his patients and his own financial well-being, also give some insight into his character.

---------------------------------------------------

A Critical Eye Cast on Presby
by Ariel Berschadsky
Wall Street Journal
4/12/01, p. A17

Your March 29 Marketplace article on surgery for presbyopia ("Is End of Reading Glasses in Sight?") illustrates the same conflicts of interest, hypocrisy, and disregard for patient welfare that have characterized refractive surgery in this country for the last two decades.

Here we have Dr. Barrie Soloway, who owns nearly $100,000 worth of shares in Presby (the sole provider of anti-presbyopia implants) yet doesn't feel that his objectivity about presbyopic surgery is compromised. I hope that his efforts to promote the surgery among his patients will increase the value of his stockholdings.

Here we have Dr. Jay Pepose, who won't have the surgery performed on himself, but gladly operates on others as a "clinical investigator." I hope that his prudence in deciding to "wait and see" will be rewarded by the knowledge gained from his presbyopic guinea pigs.

Here we have Dr. Ron Schacher, himself a 60% owner of Presby, dismissing complaints of his patient Charles Scatena that post-surgical visual exercises caused him headaches rather than improved vision with the condescending, "I have more experience than he does." I hope not to see widespread reports of similar post-operative disasters, lest ophthalmologists be prevented from joining the financial party and instead have to clean up the surgical mess left behind by others.

Whether surgery for presbyopia will join the junk heap along with past forms of refractive surgery such as RK, ALK, and PRK remains to be seen, as will the ultimate cost in terms of people's eyesight.


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Design By Poker Bandits